Do you believe it is better for students to focus before their university study?

Do you believe it is better for students to focus before their university study?

MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, more straightforward to write, simpler to read.

PARAGRAPH 1
Practical experience, contacts, at work skills. EG: Studies from the UK Government show graduates with work experience are twice as likely to find employment…..

PARAGRAPH 2
Better preparation, chance to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and sector that is private helps student decide on future before committing long term, EG 1/6 students can change their advanced schooling course while at uni….

Lots of people genuinely believe that it is safer to learn something in a combined group instead of individually. Do you agree or disagree?

Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has advantages that are many of teamwork could be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise

Paragraph 2
Disagree – Individualism is better
Self reliant, own the result, not based upon others
More mature way, more responsible
No laggards

Topic and Answer: Education (child)

Some individuals believe that children needs to do organised activities inside their spare time although some think that children should be able to do what they want to do within their spare time. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to guide your answer.

PARAGRAPH 1 -In favour of letting them choose.
-benefits letting your head wonder, children can go to town, find themselves, do what they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent studies show 12% of school students reliable essay writing service dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it would be unfair for this minority.

PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan
-possible ‘equipment’ to buy
-furthermore studies also show that mental performance operates better after a distraction from an organized task such as studying.

Topic and Answer: Globalisation

Many individuals say that globalisation while the growing number of multinational companies have a effect that is negative the environment. Which viewpoint would you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to guide your answer. From what extent can you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to guide your situation.

PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE SURROUNDINGS
-Increased interaction between countries
-Increase in goods and services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop of the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these can have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the local ecosystem…

Scientists genuinely believe that to be able to protect environmental surroundings, people must use less energy within their daily lives. However, a lot of people have never changed the real way they live. Why do you would imagine many people have never taken action that is individual? What might be done to cause them to become do something?

Ideas for body paragraph 1

Not taken action that is individual:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy of this commons
– Collective problem – more straightforward to shirk responsibility

Ideas for body paragraph 2

What might be done to cause them to become do something?
– Media campaigns by the government
– Tax or incentives that are financial In Tokyo ……

Some genuinely believe that could be the responsibility of men and women to deal with the environmental surroundings. Others say it will be the government that should take care of the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Paragraph 1
People should care for the surroundings because:
Our company is the consumers, we vote with your wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)

Paragraph 2
Government should care for the environment because:
they will have the power to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
Supposed to be guardians for the country, which means that collectively they have been guardians of the earth… although not true the truth is

Conclusion
Both should always be doing more!

In a lot of countries small shops and town centers are getting away from business, because individuals tend to drive into the large stores that are out-of-town. This leads to a rise in car use, and in addition it ensures that people without cars don’t have a lot of access to stores that are out-of-town. Do you think features of such development outweigh its disadvantages?

Copyright© 2012 subaru-design All Rights Reserved.